back to top

Who is failed CM in India? A question that has no easy answer

India is a vast and diverse country with 28 states and 8 union territories, each with its own chief minister (CM) who is the head of the state government. The CMs are elected by the people or by the members of the state legislative assembly, and they hold office for a maximum of five years or until they lose the confidence of the assembly. The CMs are responsible for the administration, development, and welfare of their respective states, and they also represent their states at the national level.

However, not all CMs are able to perform their duties effectively and efficiently. Some CMs face various challenges and difficulties such as political instability, corruption, violence, natural disasters, public health crises, etc. that hamper their governance and service delivery. Some CMs also face criticism and opposition from their own party members, allies, rivals, media, civil society, etc. that affect their popularity and credibility. Some CMs also make mistakes and blunders that cause public outrage and dissatisfaction.

But who is failed CM in India? This is a question that has no easy or objective answer. Different people may have different opinions and criteria to judge the performance and failure of a CM. Some may look at the economic indicators such as growth rate, per capita income, poverty level, unemployment rate, etc. Some may look at the social indicators such as literacy rate, health status, gender equality, human development index, etc. Some may look at the political indicators such as stability, democracy, law and order, security, etc. Some may look at the environmental indicators such as pollution level, forest cover, biodiversity, climate change, etc. Some may look at the ethical indicators such as honesty, integrity, transparency, accountability, etc.

Moreover, the performance and failure of a CM may vary over time and across different domains. A CM may do well in some areas but poorly in others. A CM may do well in some periods but poorly in others. A CM may do well in some regions but poorly in others. A CM may do well for some sections but poorly for others.

Therefore, it is not possible to give a definitive or conclusive answer to who is failed CM in India. It depends on how one defines and measures failure and success. It also depends on how one weighs and balances the various factors and aspects that influence the performance and failure of a CM. It also depends on how one views and evaluates the role and responsibility of a CM in relation to other actors and institutions that shape the governance and development of a state.

However, one can still try to identify some common indicators or parameters that can help to assess the performance and failure of a CM in India. These may include:

  • The extent to which a CM fulfills the promises and commitments made to the people during elections or otherwise.
  • The extent to which a CM implements the policies and programs that are beneficial for the people and the state.
  • The extent to which a CM responds to the needs and demands of the people and addresses their grievances and problems.
  • The extent to which a CM maintains peace and harmony among different communities and groups in the state.
  • The extent to which a CM handles crises and emergencies such as natural disasters, epidemics, riots, etc.
  • The extent to which a CM cooperates with the central government and other states on matters of national interest and inter-state relations.
  • The extent to which a CM upholds the constitutional values and principles such as democracy, secularism, federalism, etc.
  • The extent to which a CM respects the rule of law and human rights of all citizens.
  • The extent to which a CM avoids corruption, nepotism, favoritism, etc.
  • The extent to which a CM inspires confidence and trust among the people.

Based on these indicators or parameters, one can try to compare and contrast the performance and failure of different CMs in India. However, one should also keep in mind that these indicators or parameters are not exhaustive or definitive. They are also subject to interpretation and variation depending on the context and perspective of different stakeholders.

Therefore, who is failed CM in India is a question that has no easy answer. It is a question that requires careful analysis and evaluation based on facts and evidence. It is also a question that invites debate and discussion among different opinions and viewpoints. It is also a question that challenges us to reflect on our own expectations and aspirations from our leaders and representatives.

Published at :

EBNW Story is managed by students of Saksham Sanchar Foundation. If you like the efforts to make #BrilliantBharat, you can encourage them through donation - Thank you