After a prolonged battle with the Censor Board, Kangana Ranaut’s directorial debut, Emergency, finally made its way to the big screen, presenting an intimate portrayal of Indira Gandhi, India’s first female Prime Minister. While the film attempts to delve into one of the most controversial chapters of Indian history—the Emergency period of 1975-77—it serves as both a cinematic experience and a thought-provoking life lesson.
The first half of the movie, however, feels rushed and somewhat incomplete. The lack of depth in detailing the political, social, and personal dynamics of the time is noticeable. One can’t help but think that the narrative would have benefited greatly from the longer format of a web series, allowing for a more comprehensive exploration of the events and characters. The second half, however, redeems itself by presenting a more gripping and impactful account of the Emergency and its ramifications.
As a directorial debut, Ranaut’s effort is commendable but lacks the finesse and experience needed for a subject of such magnitude. A film that seeks to depict a leader as polarizing and complex as Indira Gandhi demands a nuanced approach—something that seems to fall short in certain parts.
Yet, despite its flaws, Emergency offers a compelling reflection on leadership, power, and humanity. Indira Gandhi’s journey is portrayed as a cautionary tale—a story of a leader whose love for her nation turned into stubbornness and an unrelenting grip on power. The film subtly, yet powerfully, underscores the harsh truth of politics: the relentless pursuit of the “seat” of power often comes at the expense of the very people it is meant to serve.
The Emergency, as shown in the film, was less about the nation’s need and more about personal ambition. It highlights how a single decision rooted in political insecurity led to widespread suffering, deaths, and the curtailment of civil liberties. While leaders are human and prone to mistakes, the consequences of their missteps are amplified when they hold such positions of power.
The film also leaves viewers pondering the question: did Indira Gandhi ever truly regret her decisions? Perhaps she did reflect on her actions, but as the narrative suggests, her realization came too late. Her pashchyatap (repentance), while significant, could not undo the damage caused by her decisions.
Sanjay Gandhi’s role is well-defined and integral to the storyline, adding layers to the narrative making him the main character behind the emergency. The supporting cast delivers powerful performances, ensuring that the weight of the historical drama does not solely rest on Ranaut’s shoulders. Each actor brings depth and credibility to their characters, elevating the film’s overall impact.
Ultimately, Emergency serves as a mirror to the complexities of leadership and the fragile balance between power and responsibility. While it may not be flawless in execution, the film succeeds in provoking thought and reminding viewers that every leader, no matter how influential, is human—and humanity comes with its share of failings.